1997
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-65001997000300001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CAT Tool for Frequency-domain Testing and Diagnosis on Analog

Abstract: This

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some faults affecting components R2, R3 and C2 have proven equivalent. In fact, this just confirms the conclusion drawn in [2] that these faults lead to similar faulty behaviors in a broad range of frequencies.…”
Section: Practical Experimentssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some faults affecting components R2, R3 and C2 have proven equivalent. In fact, this just confirms the conclusion drawn in [2] that these faults lead to similar faulty behaviors in a broad range of frequencies.…”
Section: Practical Experimentssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These faults cause strong changes in behavior since circuits are moved out of the linear region of operation. Diagnosis experiments based on sensitivity analysis [2] had already shown in the past that the detection regions for those faults may be very similar for many components of the CUT. That is the reason why we are now focusing our research work on finding a model that is capable of dealing with this situation.…”
Section: Practical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If diagnosis is not a concern, the individual frequency subsets can be merged together, in such a way that a smaller set of test stimuli is obtained. [2] also applies sensitivity analysis to analog circuits, but generates a minimal subset of input-parameter pairs that simultaneously maximizes fault detection and fault diagnosis. Other existing test generation techniques are ad-hoc methods, thus devoted to specific circuit classes (see, for example, [3]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%