2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A catalogue of impact craters larger than 200 m and surface age analysis in the Chang'e-5 landing area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
43
3
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
43
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mare basalts are subdivided into three Imbrian-aged units (Im1, Im2, and Im3), characterized by low-Ti, low-Fe contents, and a high crater density [2]; and four Eratosthenian-aged units (Em1, Em2, Em3, and Em4), characterized by high-Ti, high-Fe, and high-Th contents, richer in olivine than the old Imbrian-aged mare basalts on the eastern nearside, and a lower crater density [2]. Although the crater size-frequency distribution (CSFD) absolute model ages of each geological unit may be more complicated [19][20][21][22], the subdivisions of geological units are diagnostic in terms of surface reflectance data and derived compositional data (e.g., Clementine UVVIS data and Kaguya MI data) and correspond well with Hiesinger et al [14,16] and Boroughs and Spudis [23], etc. ; therefore, we mainly assess and address their results in this study.…”
Section: Brightness Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mare basalts are subdivided into three Imbrian-aged units (Im1, Im2, and Im3), characterized by low-Ti, low-Fe contents, and a high crater density [2]; and four Eratosthenian-aged units (Em1, Em2, Em3, and Em4), characterized by high-Ti, high-Fe, and high-Th contents, richer in olivine than the old Imbrian-aged mare basalts on the eastern nearside, and a lower crater density [2]. Although the crater size-frequency distribution (CSFD) absolute model ages of each geological unit may be more complicated [19][20][21][22], the subdivisions of geological units are diagnostic in terms of surface reflectance data and derived compositional data (e.g., Clementine UVVIS data and Kaguya MI data) and correspond well with Hiesinger et al [14,16] and Boroughs and Spudis [23], etc. ; therefore, we mainly assess and address their results in this study.…”
Section: Brightness Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CE-5 plans to collect~2 kg (~2 m in core length) of lunar regolith from the surface utilizing a robotic arm and subsurface drilling [24], to study the subsurface structures, especially regolith properties. However, until now, the geological study of the Rümker region is mainly based on spectral and topographic data [2,20,22], and details of the regolith properties of the CE-5 landing region are not well constrained. Campbell et al [25] analyzed the surface properties of Mons Rümker with Earth-based radar data and found it likely to be covered with rock-poor, fine-grained pyroclastic materials.…”
Section: Brightness Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The landing site of Chang'e-5 in Northern Oceanus Procellarum has a number of scientific significances; e.g., the lander is within one of the youngest lunar mare basalts (Em4) [33][34][35][36], which was never investigated in situ by previous landed missions. Evidently, the lander location information is very important for further investigation of the landing site; particularly, it helps to provide geologic context for the collected lunar samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After excluding the secondaries from crater Copernicus, Harpalus, and Pythagoras, the Em4 was dated to 1.49 Ga [9]. Based on digital orthophoto map (DOM) derived from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) images and the SLDEM2015 elevation model, Jia et al [10] dated the Em4 using the craters with a diameter larger than 200 m, and derived the AMA of 2.07 Ga. Qian et al [11] divided the Em4 unit into 52 squares with the width of 1 • × 1 • and dated each of them. They dated the AMAs of the squares ranging from 2.9 Ga to 1.1 Ga, and the AMA of the entire Em4 unit was 1.53 Ga.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%