2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2011.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A categorical invariant for cubic threefolds

Abstract: We prove a categorical version of the Torelli theorem for cubic threefolds. More precisely, we show that the non-trivial part of a semi-orthogonal decomposition of the derived category of a cubic threefold characterizes its isomorphism class.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
121
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
121
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that if X is a smooth cubic threefold, the equivalence class of a notable admissible subcategory A X (the orthogonal complement of {O X , O X (1)}) corresponds to the isomorphism class of J(X) as principally polarized abelian variety [BMMS09]; the proof is based on the reconstruction of the Fano variety and the techniques used there are far away from the subject of this paper.…”
Section: Moreover the Semiorthogonal Decomposition Is Essentially Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that if X is a smooth cubic threefold, the equivalence class of a notable admissible subcategory A X (the orthogonal complement of {O X , O X (1)}) corresponds to the isomorphism class of J(X) as principally polarized abelian variety [BMMS09]; the proof is based on the reconstruction of the Fano variety and the techniques used there are far away from the subject of this paper.…”
Section: Moreover the Semiorthogonal Decomposition Is Essentially Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [BMMS12], motivated by Kuznetsov's work [Kuz08], Bernardara-Macri-Mehrotra-Stellari described the triangulated category D X in terms of sheaves of Clifford algebras on P 2 . Let B 0 (resp.…”
Section: Appendix B: the Lower Dimensional Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the assumptions in Subsection 6.1 are checked to satisfy in [BMMS12, Section 2.3]. Also there is an equivalence of triangulated categories (denoted by (σ * • Φ ′ ) −1 in [BMMS12])…”
Section: Appendix B: the Lower Dimensional Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence 1,1,3) , P (1,1,3,1) , P (1,3,1,1) , P (3,1,1,1) , P (5,5,5,3) , P (5,5,3,5) , P (5,3,5,5) , P (3,5,5,5) , Z (1,1,2,2) := P (1,1,2,2) , P (2,2,1,1) , P (5,5,4,4) , P (4,4,5,5) , Z (1,2,1,2) := P (1,2,1,2) , P (2,1,2,1) , P (5,4,5,4) , P (4,5,4,5) , Z (1,2,2,1) := P (1,2,2,1) , P (2,1,1,2) , P (5,4,4,5) , P (4,5,5,4) and…”
Section: The Fermat Sexticunclassified
“…A derived categorical approach due to Kuznetsov [22] has seen recent activity [1,2,5,24]. Using the theory of semiorthogonal decompositions Kuznetsov constructs a triangulated category A X ⊂ D b (X) and conjectures that it encodes all the information concerning the rationality of X.…”
Section: Theorem 12 Let S ⊂ P 3 Be the Sextic Fermat Surface Then mentioning
confidence: 99%