2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A causal role of anterior prefrontal-putamen circuit for response inhibition revealed by transcranial ultrasound stimulation in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on these results, the current challenge is to develop efficacious neuromodulatory protocols with minimal auditory interference. Efforts in this direction are already underway (Mohammadjavadi et al, 2019; Nakajima et al, 2022; Zeng et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Building on these results, the current challenge is to develop efficacious neuromodulatory protocols with minimal auditory interference. Efforts in this direction are already underway (Mohammadjavadi et al, 2019; Nakajima et al, 2022; Zeng et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, in light with the abundant evidence from controlled systems, one could argue that the TUS dose in the present study could have been insufficient to evoke direct neuromodulation. Indeed, despite the applied intensities exceeding prior relevant human work (Fomenko et al, 2020; Legon, Bansal, et al, 2018; Xia et al, 2021) the total applied neuromodulatory doses are relatively low as compared to, for example, repetitive TUS protocols (rTUS) in animal work (Folloni et al, 2019; Verhagen et al, 2019) or recent human studies (Nakajima et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total on-state duration of TUS is 8 s in the two protocols, and no subjects reported any adverse effects throughout the experiments of both the protocols. In [45], LTDlike plasticity in human left M1was induced by a 40 s train of pulsed TUS (I SPPA = 30.0 W cm −2 , I SPTA = 9.0 W cm −2 , in total 12 s on-state duration) with no adverse effects after the TUS experiments. Though these results together support that the 15 min rTUS protocol used in this study would be safe, more studies are needed to further accumulate safety evidence.…”
Section: Safety Issuesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other side, Nakajima et al showed that a 40 s train of pulsed TUS could induce LTD-like plasticity (i.e. long-lasting suppressed MEP) in human left M1 [45]. These results suggest that the LTP/LTD-like plasticity induced by TUS is dependent on the acoustic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…224 This multimodal approach contributed to the understanding of both the parameter setting of TUS neuromodulation toward cortical and subcortical regions and the interconnections of deep brain structures to cortical regions. 224 improving motor functions and task-related results following ultrasonic therapy to the thalamus. 240 It becomes clear that TUS has excellent properties for targeting deep brain regions, perhaps even combinable and applicable in DBS patients and beyond.…”
Section: Spinal Cord Stimulation (Scs)mentioning
confidence: 99%