2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.idcr.2020.e00791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cautionary tale of false-negative nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there is still diagnostic uncertainty regarding the sensitivity of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal specimens, a single negative result may be insufficient to rule-out disease. 6 The peculiarity of our case is that in our patient skin lesions appeared as the first manifestation of the infection, 10 days before the F I G U R E 1 Coalescing erythematous patches on the patient's trunk and thighs, with some scattered targetoid lesions…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Since there is still diagnostic uncertainty regarding the sensitivity of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal specimens, a single negative result may be insufficient to rule-out disease. 6 The peculiarity of our case is that in our patient skin lesions appeared as the first manifestation of the infection, 10 days before the F I G U R E 1 Coalescing erythematous patches on the patient's trunk and thighs, with some scattered targetoid lesions…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Limitations include the suboptimal sensitivity of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2. 31 The lack of reliable serology during the pandemic also meant that cases could not be confirmed retrospectively. Important questions still remain unanswered.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) of nasopharyngeal swabs are the primary method used to identify SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals 2 . These tests can diagnose disease during a narrow window of active infection and have limited clinical sensitivity [4][5][6][7] . Thus, additional complementary methods are needed to identify individuals who are or have been infected with SARS-CoV-2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%