2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cellular automata model for liquid distribution in trickle bed reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the cellular automated model recently published by Alopaeus et al [24] or the conceptual pore level model [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the cellular automated model recently published by Alopaeus et al [24] or the conceptual pore level model [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently some models have recognized the uneven distribution of liquid phase (Iliuta and Larachi 2005;Alopaeus et al 2006), but only rarely has any notice been taken of factors causing liquid spreading. For example, in case of a single-point liquid distribution, the current models fail to reproduce the measured pressure drop, liquid holdup, and final liquid distribution due to their inability to properly account for the radial spreading of the liquid phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, in many cases biofilm formation is connected with fouling phenomena [26], this is not the case in trickle bed reactors for syngas fermentation where the organic loading rate is low and does not allow for high microbial growth. The basic drawback is channeling [27], that is the flow of the liquid through limited paths across the packed bed resulting in a non-homogenous biofilm growth in the reactor and lower CH4 productivity rates. The operational parameters that are amenable to optimization are the liquid recirculation rate, the gas inflow rate and the hydraulic retention time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%