2011 Seventh International Conference on Natural Computation 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icnc.2011.6022364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cellular automaton framework for within-field vineyard variance and grape production simulation

Abstract: Abstract-Winegrowers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whatever the indirect method used, they all allow a fast and non-invasive alternative to manual sampling. They allow identifying single berries in images, even taken from a simple device such as a smartphone [56][57][58] and then using different methods such as convolutional neural networks [1,59], cellular automata [60], or even sensors capable of collecting phenotypic traits of grape bunches, that are known to be related with grapevine yield [14,61], to estimate yields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever the indirect method used, they all allow a fast and non-invasive alternative to manual sampling. They allow identifying single berries in images, even taken from a simple device such as a smartphone [56][57][58] and then using different methods such as convolutional neural networks [1,59], cellular automata [60], or even sensors capable of collecting phenotypic traits of grape bunches, that are known to be related with grapevine yield [14,61], to estimate yields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also well-known that repeating applications of simple rules lead to extremely complex behavior that can emulate physical, social and biological systems [13]. CA can also explain and predict changes in dynamics of environment systems and agricultural systems, for instance, the simulations of an individual plant growth [14,15], population dynamics [16], and community interaction levels [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%