2003
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2002.806256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cellular coevolutionary algorithm for image segmentation

Abstract: Abstract-Clustering is inherently a difficult problem, both with respect to the definition of adequate models as well as to the optimization of the models. In this paper we present a model for the cluster problem that does not need knowledge about the number of clusters a priori. This property is among others useful in the image segmentation domain, which we especially address. Further, we propose a cellular coevolutionary algorithm for the optimization of the model. Within this scheme multiple agents are plac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Definitely, there exist other sophisticated methods, e.g., Markov random field based segmentation [6,44,18,14], multilevel, resp., scale-space approaches [20], anisotropic filtering [3] segmentation based on genetic algorithms [47,13,22], neural networks [48,1], hybrid segmentation techniques [32], statistical procedures [19,49,2] and adaptive weight smoothing [33]. A qualitative and quantitative comparison of conventional segmentation operators was tested for small samples (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitely, there exist other sophisticated methods, e.g., Markov random field based segmentation [6,44,18,14], multilevel, resp., scale-space approaches [20], anisotropic filtering [3] segmentation based on genetic algorithms [47,13,22], neural networks [48,1], hybrid segmentation techniques [32], statistical procedures [19,49,2] and adaptive weight smoothing [33]. A qualitative and quantitative comparison of conventional segmentation operators was tested for small samples (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there exists a huge number of objects having different variations among them, these objects are only differentiable if they have different appearance and visually distinct from each other. Since the number of clusters is neither fixed nor manually provided, the minimization of the intra-region variability and the maximization of the inter-region variability in the union of two regions are considered in our algorithm like [16]. However, both the straight minimization of the intra-region variability and the maximization of the inter-region variability lead to undesirable trivial solutions being N regions or 1 region respectively.…”
Section: ) Merging For Inter-variance Maximization and Intravariancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, the number of clusters in segmentation algorithm is either not fixed or not manually provided, the minimization of the intra-region variability and the maximization of inter-region variability in the union of two regions are considered [8]. In this way, the inter-region variability constraint defines the scale at which two regions can be differentiated from each other.…”
Section: Intra-variance and Inter-variance Testmentioning
confidence: 99%