“…While the U proxy -both for geochronology and paleo-redox studies -has been calibrated in modern seawater and biological archives (Chen et al, 1986;Cheng et al, 2000a;Chen et al, 2018b;Tissot and Dauphas, 2015;Tissot et al, 2018), no study has thoroughly revisited these calibrations with high-precision methods for U isotope analysis. Thus, while the U proxy has been successfully used to track episodes of widespread marine anoxia in the distant past (e.g., Clarkson et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018), it has to-date not been utilized with sufficient precision to resolve subtle redox changes in more recent geologic history, i.e., the Cenozoic (Wang et al, 2016;Gothmann et al, 2019;Clarkson et al, 2021). Such applications could be particularly useful in the study of climate evolution in the Quaternary, as high-temporal-resolution biological archives (e.g., deep-sea corals; Robinson et al, 2007) should in theory enable such records to be generated.…”