1986
DOI: 10.1080/00268978600101441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CEPA2 investigation of the He-He and He-Li+ potential functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our value for HeLi + is in close agreement with that of Senff and Burton [10] while that for Downloaded by [Nanyang Technological University] at 18:38 17 June 2016 Table 2. Orbital energies (see also caption to table 1).…”
Section: Interaction Energiessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our value for HeLi + is in close agreement with that of Senff and Burton [10] while that for Downloaded by [Nanyang Technological University] at 18:38 17 June 2016 Table 2. Orbital energies (see also caption to table 1).…”
Section: Interaction Energiessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The HF interaction energy obtained with our basis set for R = 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 5.6, and 7.0 bohr amounts to 0.92946, 0.12082, 1.3584 x hartrees, respectively. These results agree very well with the respective literature values of 0.92858 [48], 0.12076 [48] . This agreement gives us some confidence that the convergence pattern observed in our calculations is basis set-independent and would also hold if the perturbation equations were solved using still larger basis sets or numerical integration techniques.…”
Section: (26)supporting
confidence: 94%
“…For the X 1 Σ + ground state, the calculated characteristic spectroscopic data were found to be in perfect agreement with the best obtained results available from the literature in the past (Senff & Burton 1986;Elford et al 1999). For the ground state (X-state) and the first excited 1,3 Σ + states (A-and a-states), radiative association processes were investigated in detail (Augustovičová et al 2012;Bovino et al 2011).…”
Section: Nonadiabatic Nuclear Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 71%