2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13272-019-00415-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CFD benchmark of active flow control for buffet prevention

Abstract: This paper will present the main results of the aerodynamic design and analysis for flow control applied to trailing edge of wings and profiles. This work has been conducted in the framework of the European project AFLoNext aiming at developing technologies allowing for an improvement of the performance and loads situation in the operational domain. The technologies are expected to provide an increase in aerodynamic efficiency and a structural weight reduction for the design flight conditions with a potential … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our identification of the fluid and structural wakemakers could also be useful for realising effective control strategies for the buffet phenomenon, and the interested reader is referred to e.g. D 'Aguanno, Schrijer & van Oudheusden (2019) and Sartor et al (2020). Second, in figures 5 and 7(b), for the group of modes near angular frequency ω = 1.8, the Arnoldi method does indeed identify three unstable structural modes, specifically modes 19, 20 and 21, also found by the earlier flutter analysis.…”
Section: Coupled Aeroelastic Global Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, our identification of the fluid and structural wakemakers could also be useful for realising effective control strategies for the buffet phenomenon, and the interested reader is referred to e.g. D 'Aguanno, Schrijer & van Oudheusden (2019) and Sartor et al (2020). Second, in figures 5 and 7(b), for the group of modes near angular frequency ω = 1.8, the Arnoldi method does indeed identify three unstable structural modes, specifically modes 19, 20 and 21, also found by the earlier flutter analysis.…”
Section: Coupled Aeroelastic Global Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the high-speed regime, flow separation control for buffet onset suppression offers benefits on the overall aircraft level either in speed flexibility or in wing weight reduction. The contribution of Sartor et al [6] provides an insight into a benchmark activity for validation and calibration of numerical simulation tools for buffet onset suppression influenced by AFC. This contribution has been awarded the EREA Best Paper Award 2019 as it reflects a collaborative action involving most European research institutions in aerodynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%