“…The US Supreme Court's Daubert standard has listed several criteria for qualifying expert testimony, namely, peer review, error rate, adequate testing, regular standards and techniques, and general acceptance [1]. The controversy over a US federal court ruling on fingerprint evidence [2] has reignited some old challenges to forensic science, leading to the questioning on the reliability of such disciplines as toolmarks and handwriting [3,4]. To cope with these challenges, the forensic community needs to improve its work by conducting basic research with the aim of demonstrating the scientific validity of forensic methods, taking on regular proficiency testing and reinforcing vocational training and continuing education.…”