2004
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-04-12423-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A characterization of the Anderson metal-insulator transport transition

Abstract: We investigate the Anderson metal-insulator transition for random Schrödinger operators. We define the strong insulator region to be the part of the spectrum where the random operator exhibits strong dynamical localization in the Hilbert-Schmidt norm. We introduce a local transport exponent β(E), and set the metallic transport region to be the part of the spectrum with nontrivial transport (i.e., β(E) > 0). We prove that these insulator and metallic regions are complementary sets in the spectrum of the random … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
155
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In [GK3] we defined the strong insulator region Σ SI for H ω by [GK3,Theorem 4.2]), and we must have nontrivial transport in Σ I \Σ I MSA . In this article we provide three explicit finite volume criteria for localization in Theorems 2.4, 2.5, and 2.6.…”
Section: Explicit Criteria For Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In [GK3] we defined the strong insulator region Σ SI for H ω by [GK3,Theorem 4.2]), and we must have nontrivial transport in Σ I \Σ I MSA . In this article we provide three explicit finite volume criteria for localization in Theorems 2.4, 2.5, and 2.6.…”
Section: Explicit Criteria For Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[CoH1], [K], [St], [GK3]). In particular, [GK3,Theorem A.1] proves Asumption SLI with the constant γ I in (2.7) given by…”
Section: Localization At Large Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main challenge is to allow for the Fermi energy E F to be inside a region of localization, as described for random operators in [AENSS,AG,GK1,GK3]. Note that the existence of these regions of localization has been proven for random Landau Hamiltonians with Anderson-type potentials [CH,GK4,W], and that assumption (1.4) holds in these regions of localization [BoGK,GK5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%