1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-365x(96)83019-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A characterization of the components of the graphs D(k,q)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the family of graphs CD(n, q) which provides the lower bound in the above inequality, being a slight improvement of the previous best lower bound Ω(ν 1+ 2 3k+3 ) given by the family of Ramanujan graphs constructed by Margulis [35], and independently by Lubotzky, Phillips and Sarnak [34]. In [28], Lazebnik, Ustimenko and Woldar proved that for all n ≥ 6 and q odd, the order of CD(n, q) is equal to 2q n− n+2 4 +1 , hence another family is needed if the lower bound in 4.1 is to be improved. For n = 2, 3, 5, the magnitude ν 1+ 1 n in the upper bound of 4.1 is attained by D(n, q) (n = 2, 3 and q odd) and by the regular generalized hexagon (n = 5).…”
Section: Examples and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It is the family of graphs CD(n, q) which provides the lower bound in the above inequality, being a slight improvement of the previous best lower bound Ω(ν 1+ 2 3k+3 ) given by the family of Ramanujan graphs constructed by Margulis [35], and independently by Lubotzky, Phillips and Sarnak [34]. In [28], Lazebnik, Ustimenko and Woldar proved that for all n ≥ 6 and q odd, the order of CD(n, q) is equal to 2q n− n+2 4 +1 , hence another family is needed if the lower bound in 4.1 is to be improved. For n = 2, 3, 5, the magnitude ν 1+ 1 n in the upper bound of 4.1 is attained by D(n, q) (n = 2, 3 and q odd) and by the regular generalized hexagon (n = 5).…”
Section: Examples and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We get, therefore, the following interesting corollary: 10 Ω(n 6/5 ) , O(n 5/4 ) [Tit59], [Ben66], [LU93] 12 Θ(n 6/5 ) [Tit59], [Ben66], [Wen91], [LU93] 14 Ω(n 9/8 ) , O(n 7/6 ) [LUW95], [LUW96] 16 Ω(n 10/9 ) , O(n 8/7 ) [WU93], [LUW95] 4r , r ≥ 5 Ω(n…”
Section: Sparse Spanners and Tree Coversmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…To distinguish the points from the lines we use parentheses and brackets: If x ∈ V , then (x) ∈ P and [x] ∈ L. It will also be advantageous to adopt the notation for co-ordinates of points and lines introduced in [17] for the case of general commutative ring K: p 0,1 , p 1,1 , p 1,2 , p 2,1 , p 2,2 , p 2,2 , p 2,3 , . .…”
Section: The Incidence Structures Defined Over Commutative Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For K = F q the following statement had been formulated in [17]. Let k 6, t = [(k + 2)/4], and let u = (u α , u 11 , · · · , u tt , u tt , u t,t+1 , u t+1,t , · · ·) be a vertex of D(k, K) (α ∈ {(1, 0), (0, 1)}.…”
Section: The Incidence Structures Defined Over Commutative Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation