2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Chemical Signature from Fast-rotating Low-metallicity Massive Stars: ROA 276 in ω Centauri*

Abstract: We present a chemical abundance analysis of a metal-poor star, ROA 276, in the stellar system ω Centauri. We confirm that this star has an unusually high [Sr/Ba] abundance ratio. Additionally, ROA 276 exhibits remarkably high abundance ratios, [X/Fe], for all elements from Cu to Mo along with normal abundance ratios for the elements from Ba to Pb. The chemical abundance pattern of ROA 276, relative to a primordial ω Cen star ROA 46, is best fit by a fast-rotating low-metallicity massive stellar model of 20 M ,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the CEMP-no star ET0097 at [Fe/H] = −2, which has unusually high [Sr, Y, Zr/Ba] > +0.7 (Skúladóttir et al 2015a), was best fit by a rapidly rotating massive star, which was able to explain both the high [C/Fe] and the high lighter n-capture elements. Similar conclusions were reached by Yong et al (2017) for the star ROA 276, in ω Centauri, which has extremely high [X/Fe] > +1 of the lighter n-capture elements (29 < Z < 43). However the massive star models were not able to reproduce the low [C/Fe] < 0 in ROA 276.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the CEMP-no star ET0097 at [Fe/H] = −2, which has unusually high [Sr, Y, Zr/Ba] > +0.7 (Skúladóttir et al 2015a), was best fit by a rapidly rotating massive star, which was able to explain both the high [C/Fe] and the high lighter n-capture elements. Similar conclusions were reached by Yong et al (2017) for the star ROA 276, in ω Centauri, which has extremely high [X/Fe] > +1 of the lighter n-capture elements (29 < Z < 43). However the massive star models were not able to reproduce the low [C/Fe] < 0 in ROA 276.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These three stars all show enhancements of [Sr, Y, Zr/Ba] > +0.7, which is not typical for CEMP-no stars in the Milky Way (e.g., Allen et al 2012, and references therein). However, stars with high [Sr,Y,Zr/Ba] but [C/Fe] < 0 have been observed in the Galactic halo (Honda et al 2004(Honda et al , 2006(Honda et al , 2007 and in ω Cen (Yong et al 2017). Thus, it is unclear whether the enhancements of carbon and the lighter n-capture elements is connected to the same source, or specifically to the chemical evolution of dwarf galaxies, or if it is merely a coincidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the CEMP-no star ET0097 at [Fe/H] = −2, which has unusually high [Sr,Y,Zr/Ba] > +0.7 (Skúladóttir et al 2015b), was best fit by a rapidly rotating massive star, which was able to explain both the high [C/Fe] and the high lighter n-capture elements. Similar conclusions were reached by Yong et al (2017) for the star ROA 276, in ω Centauri, which has extremely high [X/Fe] > +1 of the lighter n-capture elements (29 < Z < 43). However the massive star models were not able to reproduce the low [C/Fe] < 0 in ROA 276.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Allen et al 2012, and references therein). However, stars with high [Sr,Y,Zr/Ba] but [C/Fe] < 0 have been observed in the Galactic halo (Honda et al 2004(Honda et al , 2006(Honda et al , 2007 and in ω Cen (Yong et al 2017). Thus, it is unclear whether the enhancements of carbon and the lighter n-capture elements is connected to the same source, or specifically to the chemical evolution of dwarf galaxies, or if it is merely a coincidence.…”
Section: Carbon-enhanced Metal-poor Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the s-process elemental distribution in the metal poor star ROA 276 in ω Cen(Yong et al 2017) is well explained by the rotating models byFrischknecht et al (2012Frischknecht et al ( , 2016.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%