1971
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/12.2.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Chemical Study of Serpentinization--Burro Mountain, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
5

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are consistent with synkinematic growth of fibres around clasts and do not support the possibility of a concentration and reorientation of shorter, pre-existing fibres. This mechanism, which increases the abundance of chrysotile by creating newly formed crystals in the schistose zones, is also in accordance with field observations in low-temperature sheared serpentinites that indicate an increase of chrysotile abundance with increasing deformation degree (Page, 1968;Coleman and Keith, 1971;Wicks, 1984).…”
Section: The Formation Mechanism Of Schistosity: a Creep Processsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These observations are consistent with synkinematic growth of fibres around clasts and do not support the possibility of a concentration and reorientation of shorter, pre-existing fibres. This mechanism, which increases the abundance of chrysotile by creating newly formed crystals in the schistose zones, is also in accordance with field observations in low-temperature sheared serpentinites that indicate an increase of chrysotile abundance with increasing deformation degree (Page, 1968;Coleman and Keith, 1971;Wicks, 1984).…”
Section: The Formation Mechanism Of Schistosity: a Creep Processsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The low CaO contents of the serpentinite relative to Al 2 O 3 indicate Ca loss during serpentinization (Coleman and Keith 1971); a fractionation typically observed during open-system alteration of the oceanic lithosphere. Also, the serpentinites have a higher SiO 2 /MgO than normal Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Three processes are thought to be the most important in determining the chemical composition of the serpentinite surface rock: magmatic differentiation; sulphide saturation leading to chalcophile element depletion in ultramafic silicates within fertile serpentinites; and chemical weathering, considered to vary in intensity due to differences in the amount of sulphide and subsequent sulphuric acid generation in fertile and sterile serpentinites. Serpentinization can take place without significant metasomatism (Coleman and Keith, 1971;Komor et al, 1985;Donaldson et al, 1986) so that the serpentinization process is probably not as important as magmatic differentiation and sulphur saturation in generating Ni-sulphide ore bodies from ultramafic hosts or in generating the chemical signatures which distinguish the ultramafic hosts.…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%