“…Unfortunately, there are undeniable experimental challenges related to the viscosity measurements of volcanic melts (or their synthetic analogs), namely: (i) their undercooling-driven tendency to crystallize, which typically limits concentric-cylinder low-viscosity (~10 4 -10 -2 Pa s) determinations (e.g., Kolzenburg et al, 2018) to superliquidus temperatures and only mild undercooling; (ii) the prompt degassing of volatile-bearing melts at ambient pressure, which can be only overcome through falling-sphere experiments and the application of confining pressure (e.g., Liebske et al, 2005), with significant technical difficulties; (iii) the limited glass-forming ability of volcanic compositions, since glassy samples are necessary for high-viscosity (10 12 -10 6 Pa s) measurements by micropenetration (e.g., Di Genova et al, 2020b), parallel-plate deformation (e.g., Whittington et al, 2009), beam bending (e.g., Hagy, 1963) or fiber elongation (e.g., Taniguchi, 1992) viscometry. Moreover, even when the required glassy samples can be synthesized, their limited stability during high-temperature measurements has been repeatedly demonstrated by postmortem measurements using Raman spectroscopy and high-resolution imaging (Di Genova et al, 2020b, 2017aKleest et al, 2020;Liebske et al, 2003a;Scarani et al, 2022): nanocrystallization of Fe-Ti-oxides can affect sample homogeneity and alter the composition of the residual melt, preventing derivation of the crystal-free viscosity. As a consequence, currently available viscosity models (Giordano et al, 2008;Hui and Zhang, 2007;Langhammer et al, 2022) have been trained in a relatively restricted volcanological domain of temperature and chemistry, with questionable applicability to compositional extremes such as ultrabasic melts and very H2O-rich matrices.…”