2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0500230102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chemical waveform synthesizer

Abstract: bio-mimicking ͉ microfluidics ͉ oscillations ͉ waveform synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed rise time ͑0%-90% of max concentration͒ is less than 33 ms, which is the time between consecutive frames for our video acquisition. This result is on par with previously published results using mechanical scanning, 9 and is one order of magnitude faster than the previously reported microfluidic reagent exchange. 3 Reagent consumption per data point is proportional with the flow rate of the reagent in the injection channel and the time of reagent application to the trapped cells.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed rise time ͑0%-90% of max concentration͒ is less than 33 ms, which is the time between consecutive frames for our video acquisition. This result is on par with previously published results using mechanical scanning, 9 and is one order of magnitude faster than the previously reported microfluidic reagent exchange. 3 Reagent consumption per data point is proportional with the flow rate of the reagent in the injection channel and the time of reagent application to the trapped cells.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…8 In order to increase the throughput of this technique, Orwar and co-workers replaced the dual stream scanning probe with several parallel microfluidic channels that create different laminar flowing streams in open volumes to study fast kinetic interactions on the cell surface. 9 Because it is difficult to maintain a fixed distance between the trapped cell and the perfusion exit ports, it is difficult to collect accurate data using mechanical scanning. The drawbacks to this technique are the relatively low throughput and complex experimental setup.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatiotemporal dynamics of such networks (2, 4) is especially challenging and interesting to understand, and to reproduce in synthetic model systems (2,3,5,(9)(10)(11). Simplified physical or chemical model systems are attractive for understanding biological complexity because these models can be made simple to probe, analyze, and understand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts have resulted in the development of microfluidic platforms with rapid pattern switching for single-cell studies [''chemical waveform synthesizer'' (Olofsson et al 2005)] or slower pattern switching for higher throughput characterizations [''flow-encoded switching'' (King et al 2008)]; the setup developed by Gomez-Sjoberg et al (2007) provided a means for long-term maintenance of mammalian cell cultures (up to several weeks) in an automated, highthroughput fashion. An emerging niche for microfluidics in biological investigations has been for testing cellular network architectures under dynamic stimulation conditions, providing an optimal platform for scrutinizing existing mathematical and computer models of cellular signaling pathways to a greater degree, compared to conventional methods (Bennett et al 2008;Hersen et al 2008;Mettetal et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%