“…Such endeavors can draw on both the psychoanalytic and developmental literatures, which offer valid methods for the following: evaluating children's thinking and internal representations based on Rorschach responses (Blatt, Tuber, & Auerbach, 1990;Meyer & Tuber, 1989), interpreting the thematic contents of young children's pretend play (Keren et al, 2005;Marans et al, 1991), discerning defensive style based on response to the Thematic Apperception Test (Cramer, 1991), and assessing the quality and coherence of children's narrative stories (Fonagy & Target, 2002;Main, 2000). In addition, there is substantial evidence that projective testing can serve as an important adjunct to ongoing child psychotherapy in the following ways: elucidating pervasive patterns of defense and dysregulation that arise in multiple settings (Harris et al, 2007), measuring changes in defensive organization during the course of treatment (Cramer & Blatt, 1990), and predicting adjustment in children who have been hospitalized (Tuber, 1983). McWilliams (2008) asserts that graduate students often find themselves captivated by dynamic ideas, but can become discouraged by the perception of diminished opportunities for psychoanalytic careers.…”