1993
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.9021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chromatin folding model that incorporates linker variability generates fibers resembling the native structures.

Abstract: The "30-nm" chromatin fibers, as observed in eukaryotic nuclei, are considered a discrete level in a hierarchy of DNA folding. At present, there is considerable debate as to how the nudeosomes and linker DNA are organized within chromatin fibers, and a number of models have been proposed, many of which are based on helical symmetry and imply specific contacts between nucleosomes. However, when observed in nuclei or after isolation, chromatin fibers show considerable structural irregularity. In the present stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
230
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
230
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this scenario, the Ca 2+ -dependent step could well be either the proteolytic step or be required for the structural alteration. Changes in linker DNA topology have recently been shown to induce profound changes in chromatin structure (Widom, 1992;Yao et al, 1993;Woodcock et al, 1993;Polach and Widom, 1995;Krajewski, 1995). Since neither VM26 nor camptothecin trigger the release of small fragments there is no evidence that either Topo I or Topo II are involved in linker DNA cleavage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this scenario, the Ca 2+ -dependent step could well be either the proteolytic step or be required for the structural alteration. Changes in linker DNA topology have recently been shown to induce profound changes in chromatin structure (Widom, 1992;Yao et al, 1993;Woodcock et al, 1993;Polach and Widom, 1995;Krajewski, 1995). Since neither VM26 nor camptothecin trigger the release of small fragments there is no evidence that either Topo I or Topo II are involved in linker DNA cleavage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Woodcock et al [5] had recently theorized a range of chromatin architectures generated by continuous changes of the linker DNA length (and, therefore, the relative rotational angle) between consecutive nucleosomes. For all models a symmetrical assemblage was produced, ranging from the completely extended beads-on-a-string (relative rotational angle 180 °) to fibers with the most densely packed nucleosomes (rotational angle 252-288°).…”
Section: I~ea Krajewski/febs Letters 361 (1995) 149 152mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How~ver, as yet we have no clear picture of how the chromatin ~nvironment changes in vivo to allow these central nuclear processes to occur. Significant advances in this area have come from the recent appreciation that chromatin fiber folding may be affected by variations in the linker DNA length between ,zonsecutive nucleosomes, giving rise to changes in the relative rotation angle as well as the distance between them [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step of their study is to relate the distribution of stresses along linker DNA to the "macroscopic" stresses (force and torque) applied to the fiber ends. This allows to compute analytically the elastic constants describing the linear response of the fiber from the knowledge of naked DNA elastic constants, and to investigate quantitatively how they vary with the relaxed fiber structure, itself controlled by the "microscopic" structural parameters, as linker length l, or equivalently its relaxed twist τ 0 , and entry/exit angle Φ of linker DNA on the nucleosome [10]. The results substantiate an effective continuous description of the 30-nm fiber as an extensible worm-like rope (EWLR) extending the classical worm-like chain model [14] to an extensible and twistable chain [15] [16] [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…naked DNA connecting the nucleosomes). In Section II, we introduce a mechanical model of chromatin fiber, quite similar to the so-called two-angle model [10]; it incorporates microscopic data such as DNA structure and elastic properties [11] [12] as well as nucleosome cristallographic data [13] into an analytically tractable assembly. Its implementation gives the geometric properties of the chromatin fiber, presented in Section III with a special mention to symmetry properties and to the quantities relevant to the mechanics of the fiber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%