2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-018-0248-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chromatin integration labelling method enables epigenomic profiling with lower input

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
131
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While ChIP-based methods have been extensively used in model cell line systems, the vagaries of crosslinking and fragmenting chromatin have limited chromatin profiling by ChIP-seq to an artisan technique where each experiment requires optimization. Likewise, a recently described alternative cross-linked chromatin profiling method, ChIL-seq 27 , requires many more steps than CUT&Tag and requires 3-4 days to perform all of the steps. In contrast, the CUT&Tag procedure, like CUT&RUN, is an unfixed in situ method, and is easily implemented in a standardized approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While ChIP-based methods have been extensively used in model cell line systems, the vagaries of crosslinking and fragmenting chromatin have limited chromatin profiling by ChIP-seq to an artisan technique where each experiment requires optimization. Likewise, a recently described alternative cross-linked chromatin profiling method, ChIL-seq 27 , requires many more steps than CUT&Tag and requires 3-4 days to perform all of the steps. In contrast, the CUT&Tag procedure, like CUT&RUN, is an unfixed in situ method, and is easily implemented in a standardized approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, CUT&Tag should be suitable for the 10X Genomics encapsulation system 13 by adaptation of their recently announced ATAC-seq single-cell protocol 28 . Adaptability to high-throughput single-cell platforms is possible for CUT&Tag because adapters are added in bulk, whereas previous single-cell adaptations of antibody-based profiling methods, including ChIP-seq 29 , ChIL-seq 27 and CUT&RUN 24 require reactions to be performed after cells are separated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These regulatory systems have been studied at the genome-wide level to investigate open chromatin, proteingenome binding, and genome methylation, but it remains challenging to perform such analyses on cells located in a limited area. Given that some technologies, such as ATAC-seq, ChIL-seq and PBAT (post-bisulfite adapter tagging), commonly use ODNs as a starting material (34)(35)(36)(37), caged ODNs provide the advantage of being able to amplify sequence libraries only from photo-irradiated ROIs. Thus, PIC will be able to determine epigenetic landscapes as well as expression profiles in an ROI-specific manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the methodology uses the similarity of measured data points, this does not deduce causal directions among cells. Designing edges using emerging technologies of statistical causal inference [24,25,26,27] combined with single-cell omics data other than transcriptomes, e.g., epigenomes [28] could pave the way for the reconstruction of causal flows including cyclic relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%