2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chronic bioassay with the estuarine amphipod Corophium volutator: Test method description and confounding factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Mortality in the controls was less than 20% in the 76-d study (although mortality in a single control replicate did exceed 20%). The growth rate in the control animals in the 28-d study was 0.09 mm/d, which is in the range expected for this species as summarized by Van den Heuvel-Greve et al [18]. In the reproduction study, the mean adult lengths of Corophium ranged from 6.7 mm to 7.4 mm for all no-effect treatments, and therefore by the end of the test (day 76) most animals would have been sexually mature (i.e., >5.0 mm).…”
Section: Test Designsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Mortality in the controls was less than 20% in the 76-d study (although mortality in a single control replicate did exceed 20%). The growth rate in the control animals in the 28-d study was 0.09 mm/d, which is in the range expected for this species as summarized by Van den Heuvel-Greve et al [18]. In the reproduction study, the mean adult lengths of Corophium ranged from 6.7 mm to 7.4 mm for all no-effect treatments, and therefore by the end of the test (day 76) most animals would have been sexually mature (i.e., >5.0 mm).…”
Section: Test Designsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Longer exposure durations are expected to provide results that are of greater ecological relevance and amenable to modeling contaminant effects on population dynamics [12][13][14]. However, chronic tests have not always been determined to be more sensitive than acute methods [9,15], and long test durations sometimes result in greater variability in the performance of these tests [9,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Species survival depends ultimately on the reproductive success and quality of offspring; thus, reproductive variables are sometimes considered more predictive indicators of toxicological effects at population and community levels that may be occurring at more slightly impacted sites in the field [14]. Sublethal endpoints in laboratory-based sediment toxicity tests using amphipods have been found to be more sensitive to low concentrations of contaminants approaching the sediment quality guideline trigger values [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%