2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A circulation prediction model for ramp and vortex generator in supersonic flow: A numerical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1997; Hiejima 2016 b ; Wu et al. 2022), the maximum swirl intensity is approximately , which also depends on the free stream Mach number. The axial velocity deficit is roughly behind the device that generated the vortex and is similar to a wake flow.…”
Section: Basic Elements Of a Flow Field Studymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1997; Hiejima 2016 b ; Wu et al. 2022), the maximum swirl intensity is approximately , which also depends on the free stream Mach number. The axial velocity deficit is roughly behind the device that generated the vortex and is similar to a wake flow.…”
Section: Basic Elements Of a Flow Field Studymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…strong swirl) is difficult to generate owing to the incidence of shock waves or separation on a device. According to the devices that generate a Batchelor-type vortex in supersonic flows (Naughton et al 1997;Hiejima 2016b;Wu et al 2022), the maximum swirl intensity is approximately q ≈ 0.34, which also depends on the free stream Mach number. The axial velocity deficit is roughly 0.5-0.8 behind the device that generated the vortex and is similar to a wake flow.…”
Section: Supersonic Streamwise Vorticesmentioning
confidence: 99%