1959
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-195909000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Clarification of Some Hemodynamic Changes in Cirrhosis and Their Surgical Significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1961
1961
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pressure measurements at surgery just before creation of the portacaval shunt did not provide evidence of preoperative retrograde portal venous flow in any of the patients in this report, whereas Warren and Muller found a sinusoidal pressure higher than the free portal pressure in 3 cases out of 7, suggesting preoperative reversal of flow (5). Probably their patients were not a representative sample, since in preoperative pressure measurements by our surgical colleagues, evidence for reversed flow was found in only 7 of 61 patients (10).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Pressure measurements at surgery just before creation of the portacaval shunt did not provide evidence of preoperative retrograde portal venous flow in any of the patients in this report, whereas Warren and Muller found a sinusoidal pressure higher than the free portal pressure in 3 cases out of 7, suggesting preoperative reversal of flow (5). Probably their patients were not a representative sample, since in preoperative pressure measurements by our surgical colleagues, evidence for reversed flow was found in only 7 of 61 patients (10).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Also, in patients with cirrhosis who had portacaval anastomoses without ascites, and who presumably had a decrease in intrahepatic as well as splanchnic congestion as a result of this operation, the mean plasma volume was significantly elevated (p < 0.0001). This elevation occurred even in those patients with side-to-side portacaval anastomoses, which are thought to decongest the liver maximally (35,36) (Figure 1). Those 14 patients with cirrhosis who had portacaval anastomoses proven to be patent at autopsy in four and by catheterization in one, yet who had coexisting ascites, also had an elevated mean plasma volume (51 + 3.0 ml per kg, p < 0.01) (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the subjects had an A-HVo2 difference of 9.9 vol per cent and has not done well clinically following surgery; this may be due to progression of his underlying liver disease or may reflect inadequate sinusoidal perfusion following the shunting procedure. These reports (2,15) indicate variations within the available patient data, and usually a contrast is found between the findings following side-to-side anastomosis in humans with liver disease and in normal dogs. The most likely explanation for these data lies within the distorted parenchymal architecture of Laennec's cirrhosis, which can affect the portal venous radicles or sinusoids to a different degree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] was determined by regional indicator dilution studies. Indocyanine green (4) was injected into the FV, PVH and PVG catheters while blood was sampled from either the IVC or HV catheter with a Harvard constant speed withdrawal apparatus.'…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%