2001
DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification and characterization of skeletal class III on etio-pathogenic basis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Male mandibles are generally larger and more symmetrical than female mandibles for people of the same age. 24 Superior/inferior position of the MF Regarding the superior/inferior position of the MF, our fi ndings showed that the MF was situated slightly below the midpoint between the ABC and the IB. In general, our measured MF positions in the vertical plane were similar to previously published results.…”
Section: Distributions Of Symmetry Of the Mf Positionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Male mandibles are generally larger and more symmetrical than female mandibles for people of the same age. 24 Superior/inferior position of the MF Regarding the superior/inferior position of the MF, our fi ndings showed that the MF was situated slightly below the midpoint between the ABC and the IB. In general, our measured MF positions in the vertical plane were similar to previously published results.…”
Section: Distributions Of Symmetry Of the Mf Positionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…23 Moreover, the growth and development of the mandible is affected by adaptation to physiological and functional needs. 24 Thus, variation in the location of the MF in different samples might be explained by variations in foods, habits, eruptions and sizes of the teeth, geographical environments, and racial origins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the diagnosis obtained by them may not correspond to normal occlusion or aesthetics of patients in other populations (15)(16)(17)(18). Cephalometric values of previously described analyses should not be applied to different populations, even when the evaluated patients have good occlusion and good facial aesthetics (16,18,19). Many authors have developed analyses adapting cephalometric values of previous analyses (14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification of skeletal class III malocclusion is done according to the position of the maxilla and the mandible, the maxillary alveolus, the mandibular alveolus and vertical development [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%