2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-021-03339-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification of hadoop job schedulers based on performance optimization approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ghazali et al [23] presented a novel classification system for job schedulers, categorizing them into three distinct groups: job schedulers for mitigating stragglers, job schedulers for enhancing data locality, and job schedulers for optimizing resource utilization. For each job scheduler within these groups, they provided a detailed explanation of their performance-enhancing approach and conducted evaluations to identify their strengths and weaknesses.…”
Section: Regular Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghazali et al [23] presented a novel classification system for job schedulers, categorizing them into three distinct groups: job schedulers for mitigating stragglers, job schedulers for enhancing data locality, and job schedulers for optimizing resource utilization. For each job scheduler within these groups, they provided a detailed explanation of their performance-enhancing approach and conducted evaluations to identify their strengths and weaknesses.…”
Section: Regular Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there are various job schedulers that consider data locality. These job schedulers can be classified as to whether they consider data locality at the Map task level, data locality at the Reduce task level, or data locality at the job level (both Map and Reduce tasks) [8]. For instance, Hybrid scheduling MapReduce priority (HybSMRP) [9] was presented by Ghandomi et al in 2019 and is a hybrid scheduler that combines dynamic job priority and data localization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%