2015
DOI: 10.1088/0253-6102/63/2/12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Classification of Long-Range Interactions between Two Stacks of p & p′ -Branes

Abstract: We generalize the computations of the long-range interactions between two parallel stacks of branes in [1, 2] to various cases when two stacks of branes are not placed parallel to each other. We classify the nature of interaction (repulsive or attractive) for each special case and this classification can be used to justify the nature of long-range interaction between two complicated brane systems such as brane bound states. We will provide explicit examples in this paper to demonstrate this.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…between (F, D1) and (NS5, D5) since we have attractive interaction between F and D5 and also between D1 and NS5 [4]. We will demonstrate explicitly in the following section by computing the force experienced by the (p, q) string in the (m, n) 5-brane background that indeed the no-force condition is precisely the same as the condition (3.12).…”
Section: Jhep08(2017)007mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…between (F, D1) and (NS5, D5) since we have attractive interaction between F and D5 and also between D1 and NS5 [4]. We will demonstrate explicitly in the following section by computing the force experienced by the (p, q) string in the (m, n) 5-brane background that indeed the no-force condition is precisely the same as the condition (3.12).…”
Section: Jhep08(2017)007mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, we know that there is no-force between D1 and D5 in the threshold bound state (D1, D5) (or between F and NS5 in (F, NS5)) and so if 1/4 BPS ((F, D1), (NS5, D5)) bound state indeed exists, we expect that there should also be no-force between the non-threshold (F, D1) and the non-threshold (NS5, D5) and this bound state should also be threshold with respect to these two constituent non-threshold bound states. While it is true that there is no force between D1 and D5 and between F and NS5 in this bound state, we do have an attractive long-range force acting between F and D5 or between D1 and NS5 (for example, see [4]). We, therefore, expect a net attractive force between (F, D1) and (NS5, D5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason for this is simple since only different constituent branes contribute to this long-range interaction and each contribution is from the respective NS-NS sector and is attractive. For example, if we have both electric and magnetic fluxes present on Dp and Dp ′ , the F-strings (see footnote (4)) within Dp ′ have no interaction with their parallel F-strings within Dp but have a long-range attractive interaction with D(p -2) branes (see footnote (4)) within Dp. However, as indicated above for p = 6 and p ′ ≤ 6, the long-range interaction can be repulsive in the presence of certain types of fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%