2016
DOI: 10.15436/2378-6841.16.914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Classroom Exercise to Teach Undergraduates to Critically Think Using Primary Scientific Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the teacher stated that the students started to think critically about different topics and reflect on their own performance. This finding seems to be consistent with other research which found that the FCS increased students' knowledge acquisition, understanding and critical thinking skills [49]- [51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, the teacher stated that the students started to think critically about different topics and reflect on their own performance. This finding seems to be consistent with other research which found that the FCS increased students' knowledge acquisition, understanding and critical thinking skills [49]- [51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Ennis (2013), that the best way to teach critical thinking is to combine it with another subject, rather than as a separate course. Participation in research processes is one of the most effective ways to develop critical thinking, which is why research activities are essential to the development of critical thinking (Mataniari et al, 2020) Critical reasoning is widely recognized as a crucial educational outcome (Bayram et al, 2019;Zimeri, 2016) however, teaching critical thinking is not a simple task (Fukuzawa & DeBraga, 2019). It is difficult for teachers to develop students' critical thinking skills if the teachers themselves do not have a strong understanding of critical thinking and how to encourage it in the classroom (Jatmiko et al, 2018;Suwandi & Istiyono, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%