1982
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.19.6.408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clinical and genetic study of Hunter's syndrome. 2 Differences between the mild and severe forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
80
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasons for the discrepancy would be partly due to the manner of classifying the severity of Hunter disease. The conventional classification has been defined mainly according to the severity regarding intelligence (Young et al 1982). However, some patients with severe mental disability have relatively mild somatic manifestations, and vice versa (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for the discrepancy would be partly due to the manner of classifying the severity of Hunter disease. The conventional classification has been defined mainly according to the severity regarding intelligence (Young et al 1982). However, some patients with severe mental disability have relatively mild somatic manifestations, and vice versa (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About two-thirds of patients have cognitive impairment and/or behavioral abnormalities (Froissart et al 1998, Vafiadaki et al 1998. These patients are often described as having the severe phenotype, and they typically only survive into the second and occasionally the third decade of life (Jones et al 2009, Young andHarper 1983;Young et al 1982b). Patients with the attenuated phenotype do not have cognitive impairment; however, they can experience all of the somatic signs and symptoms of the disease, although often with a more gradual onset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with cognitive impairment, somatic involvement is usually severe and of early onset and may include coarse facial features, bone and joint abnormalities, short stature, respiratory and cardiac disease and hearing abnormalities. Somatic involvement in patients without cognitive impairment can range from being severe with early onset to much less severe with later onset (Young et al 1982;Young and Harper 1983;Neufeld and Muenzer 2001;Schwartz et al 2007;Wraith et al 2008b); this group of patients usually exhibits minimal or no neurological involvement. Management of patients with MPS II requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a range of specialties such as cardiology, neurology, psychology, pulmonology and orthopaedics (Wraith et al 2008a;Muenzer et al 2009;Scarpa et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%