2022
DOI: 10.1177/03015742211073755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Clinical Audit of Cross-Infection Control Practices in Orthodontic Setups During the COVID-19 Scenario

Abstract: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused many changes in the practice of orthodontics, with the main focus being prevention of cross-infection. Clinical audits can help assess the extent to which practices/practitioners adhere to standard cross-infection control protocols, thereby providing scope for improvement resulting in better treatment outcomes. Objective: Phase 1—to investigate the type of cross-infection control procedures being followed by orthodontic residents of 5 dental institutes in Hyderabad … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most common practices were checking the temperature (71.7%) and obtaining a brief travel history (59.4%). This is similar to the findings of 14 Thakur et al where screening for temperature was done in 88% of the orthodontic set ups in Hyderabad, India. However compared to Thakur et al 's study where only 32% of the orthodontic practices were enquiring COVID-19 symptoms from their patients , majority of our participants followed this practice (68.9%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Most common practices were checking the temperature (71.7%) and obtaining a brief travel history (59.4%). This is similar to the findings of 14 Thakur et al where screening for temperature was done in 88% of the orthodontic set ups in Hyderabad, India. However compared to Thakur et al 's study where only 32% of the orthodontic practices were enquiring COVID-19 symptoms from their patients , majority of our participants followed this practice (68.9%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%