2013
DOI: 10.3109/08820538.2013.833261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Clinical Comparison of Safety and Efficacy in Phacoemulsification with versus without Ophthalmic Viscoelastic Device

Abstract: Although it was found that there was no statistically difference in terms of preventing CEC loss between 1.0% sodium-Hyaluronate and the irrigation method during phacoemulsification, it was observed clinically that 1.0% sodium-hyaluronate can make the procedure easy, safer, very helpful, especially for understanding phacoemulsification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…or longer UST (uneven/ patchy endothelial damage disallowing ECD analysis; unpublished data). We think that low ECL rates in most studies could be the reason for nonsignificant results in many clinical studies (Praveen et al 2009;Vasavada et al 2010;Kugu et al 2015;Taskin & Aslan 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or longer UST (uneven/ patchy endothelial damage disallowing ECD analysis; unpublished data). We think that low ECL rates in most studies could be the reason for nonsignificant results in many clinical studies (Praveen et al 2009;Vasavada et al 2010;Kugu et al 2015;Taskin & Aslan 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 Although using OVDs is often preferred at some stages, studies have also shown that phacoemulsification surgery with IOL implantation applied without OVDs is safe and cost-effective. 23 For instance, Sallet et al compared the operating times of 100 phacoemulsification surgeries performed with and without an OVD and observed that operations without the OVD took 1.6 min less on average. 9 In a non-randomized, prospective study, Schulze et al compared the results of using an OVD versus BSS in IOL implantation during phacoemulsification surgery, among which the mean operating time was 1 min less when BSS was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 In other work, Kugu et al compared the results of phacoemulsification surgery performed with and without an OVD, and at 3 months postoperation, no significant difference had arisen in corneal endothelial loss between the groups. 23 In Taskin et al's study, the results of phacoemulsification surgery applied with and without an OVD were compared, and at 3 months after surgery, corneal endothelial loss was similar in both the BSS and OVD groups. 27 Bardaloi et al also compared pure phacoemulsification (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 3 25 26 Furthermore, there are many different factors which could affect ECD during phacoemulsification cataract surgery, such as the characteristics of the phacoemulsification device, the total surgery time and the energy delivery, phaco-mode, and last but not least, the surgeon's experience. 3 4 5 6 7 8 A prospective study performed by Kugu et al ., 27 comparing two groups of patients operated with and without VS, was published in 2015. They could not determine a protective effect of 1.0% sodium hyaluronate over BSS on ECD loss during phacoemulsification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that endothelial corneal cells decrease after cataract surgery. Nevertheless, there is a great variability in literature regarding the percentage of loss after phacoemulsification, ranging from 3.1% 27 to 18.46%. 28 In this study, ECD decreased 7.11% in the first 6 months following surgery and 2.51% more in the second postoperative semester, completing a total decrease of 9.62% 1 year after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%