2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clinical evaluation of near-infrared cerebral oximetry in the awake patient to monitor cerebral perfusion during carotid endarterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This threshold is standard in the international literature and is based on the fact that in conscious patients, a 20% reduction in frontal lobe oxygenation is associated with clinical manifestations of cerebral hypoperfusion such as syncope [20,30]. Additionally, 20% or greater reduction in rSO 2 during carotid clamping test is associated with a 20-fold increase in developing overt signs and symptoms of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This threshold is standard in the international literature and is based on the fact that in conscious patients, a 20% reduction in frontal lobe oxygenation is associated with clinical manifestations of cerebral hypoperfusion such as syncope [20,30]. Additionally, 20% or greater reduction in rSO 2 during carotid clamping test is associated with a 20-fold increase in developing overt signs and symptoms of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,36 -41 Although a number of authors have compared NIRS with other techniques such as jugular bulb oxygen saturation (SjO 2 ), transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and somatosensory-evoked potential 15,37,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] or with neurologic events, few have attempted to define an absolute threshold for ischemia. 13,14,16,17,46,[57][58][59] Most studies of this type using NIRS make no attempt to correct for extracranial contributions to signal changes. Of those who have tried to identify a threshold, the results show a low sensitivity and specificity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also shown its correlation with EEG changes, transcranial Doppler, carotid stump pressure and postoperative neurological deficits [29,[30][31][32][33]. The sensitivity of this test ranges from 30 to 100% according to various studies and its specificity between 77 and 98% [29,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Near Infrared Spectroscopy (Nirs)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The sensitivity of this test ranges from 30 to 100% according to various studies and its specificity between 77 and 98% [29,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The limit value is not well established, although several studies suggest a decrease of 11.7-25% above baseline value [29,30,[34][35][36]. This method has the advantage of being non-invasive, continuous and easy to interpret but the fact of collecting information of the frontal lobe, behaves as a disadvantage as it leaves the parietal lobe unmonitored, being the most sensitive lobe to ischemia during carotid surgery [34].…”
Section: Near Infrared Spectroscopy (Nirs)mentioning
confidence: 99%