2014
DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-1558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Clinical Score (RAPID) to Identify Those at Risk for Poor Outcome at Presentation in Patients With Pleural Infection

Abstract: Background: Pleural infection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Development of a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
160
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
160
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(18) 1255 (756-3359) Protein (g/L), (15) 43.7 (11.3) IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation. The number of cases from this single South Auckland hospital (n = 108) is more than twice that of Lindstrom and Kolbe's study 8 (n = 46), which included three major hospitals in Auckland, New Zealand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(18) 1255 (756-3359) Protein (g/L), (15) 43.7 (11.3) IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation. The number of cases from this single South Auckland hospital (n = 108) is more than twice that of Lindstrom and Kolbe's study 8 (n = 46), which included three major hospitals in Auckland, New Zealand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy is currently being explored in adults through the development of the "RAPID" score. 18 This tool identifies high-risk adult patients with empyema using the following baseline characteristics: renal impairment (R), age older than 70 years (A), purulent pleural fluid on thoracentesis (P), hospital-acquired infection (I) and poor diet as measured by low albumin (D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing the ambulatory day-case pathway for patients with pleural disease is one such area. IPCs have revolutionised outpatient management of recurrent symptomatic MPE; similarly, portable devices are being evaluated in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax, whilst the question of whether patients with pleural infection stratified as low risk [147] could be cared for on an outpatient basis with intermittent therapeutic thoracentesis or ambulatory drainage is still unanswered almost two decades after its initial proposal [148]. Even a significant intervention such as medical thoracoscopy may be feasible on a day-case basis in a carefully selected subset of patients [149]; its combination with IPC insertion for patients confirmed as having malignant pleural disease may provide a complete outpatient service without the need for even a single overnight stay in hospital [128].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%