2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10134556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CLIOS Analysis for the Promotion of Sustainable Plans of Mobility: The Case of Mexico City

Abstract: Transportation systems help in shaping an area’s economic health and quality of life, providing the infrastructure for the mobility of people and goods. Nevertheless, the negative externalities of car-oriented urban-metropolitan planning have heightened awareness for the need of urban planning approaches that incorporate sustainable mobility. Consequently, cities worldwide have increasingly produced sustainable mobility plans. This points to the need of creating mechanisms to implement these sustainabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Adaptive Total Sustainable Social Indicator (ATSSI) framework integrates social sustainability into urban transportation systems, offering a lens for assessing accessibility, safety, and livability (Chatziioannou et al, 2020;Ghorbanzadeh et al, 2018). Renowned for its integrative capabilities, ATSSI is adaptable to diverse urban contexts, including developing countries with pronounced urbanization challenges (Chatziioannou et al, 2020;Ghorbanzadeh et al, 2018).…”
Section: Sustainable Urban Transport and Social Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Adaptive Total Sustainable Social Indicator (ATSSI) framework integrates social sustainability into urban transportation systems, offering a lens for assessing accessibility, safety, and livability (Chatziioannou et al, 2020;Ghorbanzadeh et al, 2018). Renowned for its integrative capabilities, ATSSI is adaptable to diverse urban contexts, including developing countries with pronounced urbanization challenges (Chatziioannou et al, 2020;Ghorbanzadeh et al, 2018).…”
Section: Sustainable Urban Transport and Social Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, although planning theories have changed their orientation (see Wilson et al, 2017 ), it is not easy to achieve a significant degree of people involvement in urban planning process ( Falco & Kleinhans, 2018 ; Holman & Rydin, 2012 ; Münster et al, 2017 ), mainly because of: (a) lack in participatory culture ( Chatziioannou et al, 2020 ), (b) bureaucracy ( Brabham, 2009 ), (c) use of wooden language ( Wilson et al, 2017 ) and (d) the loss of public trust in local authorities ( Giering, 2011 ). Even if the situation concerning specific such causes seems to be better in the post-pandemic period (i.e., bureaucracy is much more limited due to the development of specific electronic governmental apps) the loss of trust in politicians and the media is bigger.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost-effectiveness of public transportation must be evaluated to maintain an efficient, reliable, and affordable public transportation network. At the same time, encourage the growth of shared mobility services to maximize cost savings and reduce the number of vehicles on the road [57][58][59].…”
Section: P9mentioning
confidence: 99%