2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A close relationship between microplastic contamination and coastal area use pattern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the 19th century, petroleum-based polymers and plastics have occupied a major position in food packaging, but most are non-renewable, non-biodegradable, difficult to recycle, and carelessly discarded as garbage after use, thereby contributing to ecological environmental deterioration and possible health hazards [1]. Under various natural and anthropogenic forces, plastic fragments (from waste plastic containers, sheets, and films) break down into small particle sizes, further generating microplastics with a diameter smaller than 5 mm [1][2][3]. According to Lebreton et al [4], over 79,000 tons of plastic waste float on the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, and the content of marine microplastics has increased rapidly from 0.4 kg/km 2 in the 1970s to 1.23 kg/km 2 in 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 19th century, petroleum-based polymers and plastics have occupied a major position in food packaging, but most are non-renewable, non-biodegradable, difficult to recycle, and carelessly discarded as garbage after use, thereby contributing to ecological environmental deterioration and possible health hazards [1]. Under various natural and anthropogenic forces, plastic fragments (from waste plastic containers, sheets, and films) break down into small particle sizes, further generating microplastics with a diameter smaller than 5 mm [1][2][3]. According to Lebreton et al [4], over 79,000 tons of plastic waste float on the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, and the content of marine microplastics has increased rapidly from 0.4 kg/km 2 in the 1970s to 1.23 kg/km 2 in 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Tang et al [ 53 ] also suggested that, when their observations (514 particles m − 3 on average) were integrated with other studies that took place in coastal areas of China, microplastic abundance at the water surface was significantly correlated with population size ( p < 0.05, r 2 = 0.99) and urbanization rate ( p < 0.05, r 2 = 0.98). Compared with not only a bay in South Korea, where the abundance at the water surface was 770 particles m − 3 on average [ 47 ], but also other reports in China (see Reference [ 53 ]), the abundance observed by Tang et al [ 53 ] was lower. This was possibly due to (1) different sampling methodologies, (2) different degrees of population density in sampling sites, and (3) samples being collected during the rainy season.…”
Section: Microplastics and Anthropogenic Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Numerous studies have shown that areas with intensive anthropogenic activities tend to have higher microplastic pollution levels [ 17 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Previous reports related to aquatic environments ( n = 34) are listed in Table 1 , showing that 64.7% of studies sampled microplastics from water surface/column, 61.8% sampled microplastics from sediments, and only 29.4% sampled microplastics from organisms.…”
Section: Microplastics and Anthropogenic Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fishing and aquaculture activities also contribute to polluting the marine and coastal environment when fishing gear is lost or discarded at sea [207,209,210]. Jang et al observed that in a rural coastal location in Korea, polypropylene, which is used to make fishing nets and ropes, was more abundant than at both an urban site and an aquafarm.…”
Section: Marine Plastic Pollution By Coastal Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%