1951
DOI: 10.1037/h0083542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A closed-field intelligence test for rats.

Abstract: This paper describes the apparatus and test items of a closed-field test of rat intelligence. This method is adaptable to other animal species and has the important advantage of measuring intelligence by analysis of qualitative behaviour rather than by inference from learning scores. Data indicating the reliability and validity of the method are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
192
1
2

Year Published

1968
1968
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
192
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A 45-s intertrial interval was used to allow the experimenter time to clean the maze using a high-power cleaner (HDQ cleaner) so that olfactory cues could be eliminated. Rats were tested for 6 consecutive days on Problem 4 as described by Rabinovitch and Rosvold (1951). After testing, rats were randomly assigned to a surgery group (described above).…”
Section: Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 45-s intertrial interval was used to allow the experimenter time to clean the maze using a high-power cleaner (HDQ cleaner) so that olfactory cues could be eliminated. Rats were tested for 6 consecutive days on Problem 4 as described by Rabinovitch and Rosvold (1951). After testing, rats were randomly assigned to a surgery group (described above).…”
Section: Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is known (Davenport et al, 1970;Rabinovitch and Rosvold, 1951) that experience in one problem solving series decreases the number of errors made in a second one, the lack of correlation found in section II between testday and error number indicates that there is an increase in the difficulty levels of the mazes in the course of the test series. Indeed, the testday was found to correlate with a number of spatial maze characteristics.…”
Section: The Effect Of Experiencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…After the original set of Hebb and Williams (1946), two others were developed by Rabinovitch and Rosvold (1951) and Davenport et al (1970). The Rabinovitch-Rosvold series consists of asynmletrical test configurations.…”
Section: General Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these actions appeared to be similar to those of morphine, while others were different from "classical" opiate-like influences. One group of beta-endorphin fragments which show behavioral effects through nonclassical opioid mechanisms is that of the a-type endorphins, which consists of a-endorphin [[3E- (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)] and its fragments, e.g., [3E- (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), [3E- (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) and [3E- (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Their behavioral effects resemble those of amphetamine in a number of respects.…”
Section: Rat Maze Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peptides also enhance the apomorphine-induced stereotyped sniffing (20). In a series of foodrewarded problem solving experiments in Hebb-Williams type of mazes, amphetamine, 13E-(2-9) and [3E- (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) increased the number of errors (2). The resemblance between the effects of amphetamine and a-type endorphins on rat behavior may mean that these substances work through at least partly similar mechanisms.…”
Section: Rat Maze Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%