2010 Chinese Control and Decision Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ccdc.2010.5498337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A closed-form solution of horizontal maneuver to collision avoidance system for UAVs

Abstract: A geometric model for the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is proposed in which horizontal maneuvers are made only by changing speed while keeping the flight direction constant. The calculating formulae for projected horizontal miss distance (HMD) and reserved time (Tau) to the closest point of approach are derived from the model according to the Galilean principle of relativity. The closed-form solution is presented to predict the separation to be achieved with a horizontal collision avoidance maneuver. The in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is essential to note that many of these approaches primarily cater to rotary-wing UAVs capable of stopping and hovering, rendering them less suitable for fixed-wing UAVs. For fixed-wing aircraft, a range of geometric approaches, such as forming circular arcs or Three-Dimensional (3D) trajectories [11][12][13], velocity modulation in the horizontal plane [14], velocity obstacle concepts [15][16][17][18], differential geometry concepts [19], and the use of collision cones [20,21], have been proposed. While these methods provide some applicability to fixed-wing aircraft, they may suffer from limitations such as high computational demands and a lack of intuitive understanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is essential to note that many of these approaches primarily cater to rotary-wing UAVs capable of stopping and hovering, rendering them less suitable for fixed-wing UAVs. For fixed-wing aircraft, a range of geometric approaches, such as forming circular arcs or Three-Dimensional (3D) trajectories [11][12][13], velocity modulation in the horizontal plane [14], velocity obstacle concepts [15][16][17][18], differential geometry concepts [19], and the use of collision cones [20,21], have been proposed. While these methods provide some applicability to fixed-wing aircraft, they may suffer from limitations such as high computational demands and a lack of intuitive understanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%