2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.08.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A closed inline system for sample digestion using 70% hydrogen peroxide and UV radiation. Determination of lead in wine employing ETAAS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preconcentration system containing a 500 mg mini-column of IIP-U(VI) was constructed for the determination of uranium in natural waters using digital imaging. The experimental variables sample pH, eluent concentration, and sampling flow were optimized using a two-level full factorial design [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ] and a Doehlert matrix [ 41 , 43 , 48 ]. The experimental domains as coded and actual values of these factors established in the factorial design are shown in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preconcentration system containing a 500 mg mini-column of IIP-U(VI) was constructed for the determination of uranium in natural waters using digital imaging. The experimental variables sample pH, eluent concentration, and sampling flow were optimized using a two-level full factorial design [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ] and a Doehlert matrix [ 41 , 43 , 48 ]. The experimental domains as coded and actual values of these factors established in the factorial design are shown in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical technique of graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry (GFAAS) allows reducing the detection limits to the parts per billion (ppb) range with a relatively simple instrumentation, without so much effort and loss of time that previous extraction techniques entail, however, one of its disadvantages is a lower precision, Another disadvantage is that graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry (GFAAS) incurs a greater number of interferences. [23] The analytical technique of graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry (GFAAS) has a higher sensitivity compared to the analytical technique of flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS), which is the second most used method, because levels of ng/L can be detected. Comparing both methods of analysis, it was observed that flame offers results in shorter times, allows working with larger sample volumes and interferences are lower.…”
Section: Analytical Technique Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%