2018
DOI: 10.1123/tsp.2016-0162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Closer Look at How Self-Talk Influences Skilled Basketball Performance

Abstract: Empirical literature addressing the effectiveness of self-talk for expert performers is lacking. We addressed this shortcoming within the existent literature and examined the comparative effects of instructional and motivational self-talk on basketball free throw shooting accuracy and salient movement kinematics. We recruited 20 professional basketball players to participate in a 2 × 2 pre/post-test experiment. Free throw accuracy and movement patterns were recorded, with the latter subsequently used to calcul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results found the instructional group performed better than the control group. Similar results were also found in studies by using different motor tasks such as basketball passing accuracy and speed (Boroujeni & Shahbazi, 2011), softball throwing accuracy (Chang et al, 2014), handball accuracy (Zourbanos et al, 2013), and basketball free throw shooting accuracy (Abdoli et al, 2018). In contrast, some research found instructional self-talk has no effect on the motor task.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results found the instructional group performed better than the control group. Similar results were also found in studies by using different motor tasks such as basketball passing accuracy and speed (Boroujeni & Shahbazi, 2011), softball throwing accuracy (Chang et al, 2014), handball accuracy (Zourbanos et al, 2013), and basketball free throw shooting accuracy (Abdoli et al, 2018). In contrast, some research found instructional self-talk has no effect on the motor task.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Specifically, we found that all participants performed better both in standing long jump and line tracking under the instructional self-talk condition. The effects of instructional self-talk on motor performance may be due to performers focusing on relevant cues in the environment and specific technical/mechanical aspects of the skills compared to those who did not receive instructions (Abdoli et al, 2018; Boroujeni & Shahbazi, 2011; Chang et al, 2014; Theodorakis et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, dependent variables are incomplete and they contribute to further gaps in knowledge. For example, numerous studies have been conducted on motor performance in the learning of new skills [7,8,9,10], whereas the effects of ST on performance in competitions or at least on the performance of elite athletes has only rarely been considered [5], with some notable exceptions [20,24,25]. Increasing ST studies with elite or sub-elite athletes would not only expand our knowledge, but it would also contribute to evidence-based practice in sport psychology with elite athletes [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta‐analytic evidence indicates that both instructional and motivational self‐talk benefit performance (Hatzigeorgiadis, Zourbanos, Galanis, & Theodorakis, 2011). However, for motor tasks placing a premium on precision, instructional self‐talk seems to have a relative advantage over motivational self‐talk (Theodorakis, Weinberg, Natsis, Douma, & Kazakas, 2000), as shown by behavioral metadata revealing larger performance benefits ( d instructional = .83 vs. d motivational = .22; Hatzigeorgiadis et al., 2011) and more consistent movement kinematics (Abdoli, Hardy, Riyahi, & Farsani, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%