2015
DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2014.1002419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A closer look at return predictability of the US stock market: evidence from new panel variance ratio tests

Abstract: This paper examines the return predictability of the US stock market using portfolios sorted by size, book-to-market ratio and industry. We use novel panel variance ratio tests, based on the wild bootstrap proposed in this paper, which exhibit desirable size and power properties in small samples. We have found evidence that stock returns have been highly predictable from 1964 to 1996, except for a period leading to the 1987 crash and its aftermath. After 1997, stock returns have been unpredictable overall. At … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AMH implies that trading strategies may become unsuccessful for a time and then return to profitability, when environmental conditions become more conducive to such strategies. The more these strategies are exploited by market participants, the less successful they become (Urquhart and Hudson, 2013;Kim and Shamsuddin, 2015). The time-adaptive HAR volatility leverage of this study accounts for the heterogeneity in the market agents and in a sense captures traders' behavioural biases that are implied by AMH.…”
Section: Trading Performance With Har Volatility Leveragementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The AMH implies that trading strategies may become unsuccessful for a time and then return to profitability, when environmental conditions become more conducive to such strategies. The more these strategies are exploited by market participants, the less successful they become (Urquhart and Hudson, 2013;Kim and Shamsuddin, 2015). The time-adaptive HAR volatility leverage of this study accounts for the heterogeneity in the market agents and in a sense captures traders' behavioural biases that are implied by AMH.…”
Section: Trading Performance With Har Volatility Leveragementioning
confidence: 98%
“…We consider three panel variance ratio tests proposed by Kim and Shamsuddin (). All of the three tests control for cross‐sectional dependency and the corresponding p‐values of the tests are obtained by wild bootstrapping; therefore, from the aspect of econometrics, the test results are reliable in finite samples.…”
Section: Panel Unit Root Tests and Panel Variance Ratio Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 For example, variance ratio test (Lo & MacKinlay, 1988), multiple variance ratio test (Chow & Denning, 1993;Whang & Kim, 2003), nonparametric ranks-and signs-based variance ratio tests (Wright, 2000), wild-bootstrapped variance ratio test (Kim, 2006), and automatic variance ratio (AVR) test (Choi, 1999). The latest development in this area is the univariate (Kim, 2009) and panel versions (Kim & Shamsuddin, 2015) of the wild-bootstrapped AVR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%