1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0144-8609(98)00032-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A closer look at the bacteriology of nitrification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
112
1
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
5
112
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed variation of nitrification with depth supports the fact that the process is partly light inhibited (Fig. 5b) and this is in agreement with what we know about the distribution of nitrification in the ocean (Hagopian and Riley, 1998;Ward, 2008). High nitrification rates are usually reported near the bottom of the euphotic layer where organic matter is still abundant and light is much reduced, allowing the nitrifiers to compete with phytoplankton for the ammonium produced by remineralization (Lipschultz et al, 1991;Ward, 2008).…”
Section: Upper-ocean N Cycling: High F Ratios and Nitrification Ratessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The observed variation of nitrification with depth supports the fact that the process is partly light inhibited (Fig. 5b) and this is in agreement with what we know about the distribution of nitrification in the ocean (Hagopian and Riley, 1998;Ward, 2008). High nitrification rates are usually reported near the bottom of the euphotic layer where organic matter is still abundant and light is much reduced, allowing the nitrifiers to compete with phytoplankton for the ammonium produced by remineralization (Lipschultz et al, 1991;Ward, 2008).…”
Section: Upper-ocean N Cycling: High F Ratios and Nitrification Ratessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, salmon absorbs only around 58% of feed protein. Thus around 25% of nitrogen in feed is emitted through gill and with excrements (Hagopian, Riley, 1998).…”
Section: Nitrogen In Ras Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essa tendência se deve, provavelmente, à diminuição da eficiência da atividade microbiana ocasionada pelo desligamento dos microrganismos do meio-suporte, devido à maior turbulência no meio líquido observada no reator quando em maiores concentrações de oxigenação. Segundo HAGOPIAN & RILEY (1998), a imobilização da biomassa favorece a eficiência do processo, pois possibilita situações que permitem melhor desempenho dos microrganismos.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified