wp 2018
DOI: 10.24149/wp1811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Closer Look at the Behavior of Uncertainty and Disagreement: Micro Evidence from the Euro Area

Abstract: This paper examines point and density forecasts of real GDP growth, inflation and unemployment from the European Central Bank's Survey of Professional Forecasters. We present individual uncertainty measures and introduce individual point-and density-based measures of disagreement. The data indicate substantial heterogeneity and persistence in respondents' uncertainty and disagreement, with uncertainty associated with prominent respondent effects and disagreement associated with prominent time effects. We also … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the obtained results could be somehow indicating that highly heterogeneous survey responses regarding unemployment expectations do not necessarily indicate high employment uncertainty. This notion is also in line with recent evidence indicating that forecast disagreement and news-based indicators of uncertainty capture inherently different phenomena (Glas 2020;Krüger and Nolte 2016;Rich and Tracy 2021;Sorić and Lolić 2017). Regardless of that, the computed measure of disagreement indeed includes valuable information for the long-run state of unemployment, and this finding is very robust across countries.…”
Section: Empirical Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On the one hand, the obtained results could be somehow indicating that highly heterogeneous survey responses regarding unemployment expectations do not necessarily indicate high employment uncertainty. This notion is also in line with recent evidence indicating that forecast disagreement and news-based indicators of uncertainty capture inherently different phenomena (Glas 2020;Krüger and Nolte 2016;Rich and Tracy 2021;Sorić and Lolić 2017). Regardless of that, the computed measure of disagreement indeed includes valuable information for the long-run state of unemployment, and this finding is very robust across countries.…”
Section: Empirical Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Turning to the density‐based disagreement measures, there is a more meaningful and robust positive relationship between individual uncertainty and individual disagreement. Drawing upon the analysis of Rich and Tracy (2018), the stronger association reflects movements in the density disagreement measures at low levels of forecast dispersion that are able to pick up more of the corresponding movements in uncertainty. Nevertheless, while the statistical significance of the relationship is robust to including time and respondent effects, the incremental explanatory content of disagreement is again modest and progressively declines as we control for the time‐ and respondent‐specific components of the variance.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Only few surveys provide information about individual-specific probability distributions of inflation expectations, including the Survey of Professional Forecasters (e.g. Rich and Tracy, 2018) and Apokoritis et al (2019) for the euro area, the Bank of England survey of external forecasters (Boero et al, 2008;Tenreyro, 2019), and the Survey of Professional Forecasters (D'Amico and Orphanides, 2008) and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Survey of Consumer Expectations (Bruine de Bruin et al, 2011) for the United States.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%