2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl088235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Closure of the Mongol‐Okhotsk Ocean by the Middle Jurassic: Reconciliation of Paleomagnetic and Geological Evidence

Abstract: The late Mesozoic closure of the Mongol‐Okhotsk Ocean (MOO) is critical for understanding the tectonics of East Asia. There is a considerable mismatch (~40 million years) between the timing of MOO closure based on paleomagnetic data and geological evidence. We review paleomagnetic data from Mongolia, Siberia, and North China and argue that previously published apparent polar wander paths (APWPs) for North China and Siberia are insufficient to constrain the timing of MOO closure. Our new analysis incorporates n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the upper part of the slab inferred is oriented nearly W-E, similar to the present trend of the Mongol-Okhotsk suture. This orientation is consistent with clockwise rotation of the SIB in the Jurassic Period and an oroclinal closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean in the Middle Jurassic (Yi & Meert, 2020) or latest Jurassic-earliest Cretaceous (Van der Voo et al, 2015).…”
Section: 1029/2020jb019489supporting
confidence: 80%
“…On the contrary, the upper part of the slab inferred is oriented nearly W-E, similar to the present trend of the Mongol-Okhotsk suture. This orientation is consistent with clockwise rotation of the SIB in the Jurassic Period and an oroclinal closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean in the Middle Jurassic (Yi & Meert, 2020) or latest Jurassic-earliest Cretaceous (Van der Voo et al, 2015).…”
Section: 1029/2020jb019489supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, collisions between North China and Central Asia Orogenic Belt or South China are several tens of million years earlier than the Yanshanian orogeny and may not serve to explain this multiple‐direction compression during the Late Jurassic and earliest Cretaceous across North China. A recent study (Yi & Meert, 2020) suggests that the collision between the Central Asia Orogenic Belt and the Siberia Block occurred during the Middle Jurassic. Although this continent‐continent collision more than 1,000 km north of the northern boundary of North China might contribute to the late Jurassic compression in North China and adjacent areas, it may not explain the observed multiple‐direction (particularly the E‐W direction) feature of this compression event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another point of disagreement amongst Mesozoic reconstructions is the timing at which the Mongol‐Okhotsk Ocean (MOO) finally closed. The Y2019 reconstruction models this closure of the MOO to take place at around 130 Ma, but recent estimates span an ∼40 Myr range from Middle Jurassic (Yi & Meert, 2020) to lower Cretaceous (Ren et al., 2018) due to the conflicting interpretations between the paleomagnetic and geological records. The zircon data (Figure 2; Figures S6 and S7 in Supporting Information S1) show that category A samples are found within the region of the Amuria‐Siberia suture zone until 130 Ma, with category B and C samples occurring within the collision zone from 150 Ma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%