2016
DOI: 10.1080/10236198.2016.1250751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cloud model-based multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach for financing credit of scientific & technological small-medium enterprises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, interval number [ CL , CR ] was used to define indices under various evaluation grades, where a boundary value is a transition point between two adjacent grades and belongs to the two grades at the same time. That is, the boundary value corresponding to two adjacent grades has a membership of 0.5 [ 27 ]. We deduced the formula for the characteristic parameters of the cloud model (see Formula ( 1 )) to convert qualitative concepts into three numerical characteristics.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, interval number [ CL , CR ] was used to define indices under various evaluation grades, where a boundary value is a transition point between two adjacent grades and belongs to the two grades at the same time. That is, the boundary value corresponding to two adjacent grades has a membership of 0.5 [ 27 ]. We deduced the formula for the characteristic parameters of the cloud model (see Formula ( 1 )) to convert qualitative concepts into three numerical characteristics.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cloud model, proposed by Li et al [26] and based on probability statistics and fuzzy mathematics, is a model for converting between qualitative concepts and quantitative values. It describes the randomness and fuzziness of fuzzy concepts and overcomes the deficiencies of traditional evaluation methods in dealing with randomness and fuzziness, which has been extensively used in the fields of multi-criteria group decision making, risk evaluation, and so forth [19,27]. Assuming that U is a universe of discourse expressed by an exact numerical magnitude and that C is a qualitative concept within U, then, for element x within any universe of discourse, there is a random number u(x)2[0,1] with stabilization bias, which is referred to as the membership of x relative to C. In this case, the distribution of x within U is called a cloud, and each x value is referred to as a cloud droplet, or a quantitative description of qualitative concepts.…”
Section: Cloud Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various methods have been developed and introduced to construct the credit evaluation models, such as AHP [25,26,[42][43][44][45][46][47], fuzzy AHP (FAHP) [48,49], DEA [25], [44,45], LR analysis [27,35,50,51], artificial neural network (ANN) [52,53], and SVM [54]. However, AHP can be used to evaluate the subjective and objective attributes of multi-criteria decision making, which is capable of guiding DMs to make the best and optimal judgment.…”
Section: Previous Research On Credit Evaluation Of Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 4: Calculate the full credit score and rating The full credit score was calculated by adding up the score of the basic-score items and plus-score items. Besides, the credit level of TSMEs was divided into nine grades based on the full credit score, including AAA (more than 90), AA (85-90), A (80-85), BBB (7-80), BB (70-75), B (60-70), CCC (50-60), CC (40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50) and C (less than 40).…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the theory of the APH model, we propose a hybrid AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model to assess the atmospheric environmental quality [34,17]. In the proposed hybrid model, AHP is able to estimate the weight coefficient of the index system, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [12,11] approach can tackle the vagueness of remark in evaluation process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%