A club convergence analysis of financial integration: cross-country evidence

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the club convergence of Financial integration (FI) in the case of 60 countries from 1970 to 2015. FI plays a vital role in economic growth through sharing the risk between countries, cross-border capital association, investment and financial information. It also leads to the efficient allocation of capital and capital accumulation, thereby improving the systematic growth and productivity of the economy. Literature on examining the convergence hypothesis of FI is scarce. Design/methodology/approach This study applies the clustering algorithm to identify club convergence, advanced by the Phillips and Sul test, which enables the identification of multiple steady states or club convergence, unlike beta and sigma convergences. Findings The findings indicate the non-convergence when all 60 countries were taken together. This highlights that the selected countries' have unique transition paths in terms of FI. Hence, the authors implement the clustering algorithm, and the estimation shows that 56 countries are categorised into three different clubs. However, for the rest of four countries, the results are sort of ambiguous, favouring neither convergence nor divergence. Practical implications On the basis of three country clubs, Club 1 presents the model countries such as the Netherlands, Singapore and Switzerland. The Club 2 and Club 3 countries can start making moves towards the model countries by making policy adaptations for trade, finance and business facilitation. Originality/value The existing literature provides a plethora of studies investigating the convergence of stock markets, exchange rates and equity markets, but studies on the convergence of FI, particularly across the countries, are scarce. This study contributes by bridging this gap. The study is unique in its type as it takes into account the multiple steady states or club convergence. This study also contributes in policymaking by suggesting Club 1 countries (the Netherlands, Singapore and Switzerland) as the model ones for the FI.

Belt and Road Initiative and International Political Economy: Convergence to Transformation from Liberal Globalization to Realist Globalization?

“…The analysis of the coefficient of variation (CV) which is calculated by dividing the mean of relevant scores by the standard deviation of globalization scores of corridor countries gives the answer to the question of 'convergence'. For instance, Akram and his colleagues concluded in their analyses on the status of financial integration of 60 countries that they have an increasing coefficient of variation over the years which means different transition paths (Akram et al, 2023). Because convergence is impossible without similar, and the same transition path within a group of countries, this article sees the CV analysis as sufficient to make the convergence analysis for BRI corridors.…”

Housing price convergence: new evidence from Indian cities

“…In empirical research, the concept of club convergence has gained much attention. It has been widely applied to income, productivity, health and public expenditure, energy, environment, labour income, stock and bond markets, etc., in recent years (Kim et al, 2006;Herrerias et al, 2017;Akram and Rath, 2022;Akram et al, 2023). Additionally, Narayan (2006Narayan ( , 2007 and Abbott et al (2012) extended the convergence literature by investigating the tourism market convergence in case of Australia, Fiji and Turkey, respectively.…”