2007 International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iciinfs.2007.4579211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cluster based energy balancing strategy to improve Wireless Sensor Networks lifetime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence according to (6) we can expect a .5018 fraction of nodes belonging to a given CH's broadcasting range R neighborhood to join its cluster. Further using (5) and (6) we can derive…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence according to (6) we can expect a .5018 fraction of nodes belonging to a given CH's broadcasting range R neighborhood to join its cluster. Further using (5) and (6) we can derive…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second parameter of interest is, the knowledge of the average distance between neighboring CHs prior to deployment. This is required when the algorithm uses multi hopping over a CH overlay in sending the aggregated cluster data to BS [5] - [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the topology management scheme [6][7][8][9] is to maintain the sufficient network connectivity between the nodes such that the data can be forwarded efficiently to the sink. In Geographic Adaptive Fidelity (GAF) scheme [3,10,11], a virtual grid is formed throughout the deployed network, and each node is assigned to the virtual grid cell in which it resides.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the variation between the theoretical expected number of CHs for these algorithms is considerable when compared to the actual number of CHs obtained after deployment [8]. The second category consists of distributed clustering algorithms like DMAC [1], HEED [9], ANTCLUST based [10], MEDIC [11], EDCR [12], and its derivatives [13]. The location of a CH for these algorithms is dependent on its neighbors decision as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%