2021
DOI: 10.1002/sys.21589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cluster‐based framework for interface analysis in large‐scale aerospace systems

Abstract: This paper proposes a framework using a community maturity level metric to determine the integration readiness of interface elements in a particular network cluster. As a proof of concept this methodology is applied to an aircraft seating system to assess the readiness of complex interfaces before proceeding to full-scale production and systems integration. A multi-objective genetic algorithm, MOGA-Net, is coupled with the Newman-Girvan modularity metric as a clustering algorithm. This algorithm identifies sys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given its weaknesses, several replacements for and extensions to TRL have been proposed for assessing technology in context. For example, "Integration Readiness Levels" for considering different architectural views of a system (Jesus and Chagas Junior, 2022), "Human Readiness Levels" considering the readiness of technology to human operators (Salazar and Russi-Vigoya, 2021), and "Community Maturity Levels" that result from a cluster analysis of communities of system components (Goldschmid and Corns, 2021). However, integration and community maturity assume at least some basic level of system maturity, and human-readiness considers only operators directly using some technology not the broader community of stakeholders, e.g.…”
Section: Emerging Technology Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given its weaknesses, several replacements for and extensions to TRL have been proposed for assessing technology in context. For example, "Integration Readiness Levels" for considering different architectural views of a system (Jesus and Chagas Junior, 2022), "Human Readiness Levels" considering the readiness of technology to human operators (Salazar and Russi-Vigoya, 2021), and "Community Maturity Levels" that result from a cluster analysis of communities of system components (Goldschmid and Corns, 2021). However, integration and community maturity assume at least some basic level of system maturity, and human-readiness considers only operators directly using some technology not the broader community of stakeholders, e.g.…”
Section: Emerging Technology Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have addressed integration interface issues. To address aircraft interface complexity, Goldschmid and Corns used a genetic algorithm to group interfaces into clusters 13 for integration readiness level determination based on metrics defined by Sauser et al 14 Morgan, Holzer, and Eveleigh addressed rapid component replacement by requiring interface definition as part of a container modeling method (CMM). 15 Abdolshah et al proposed model-based reinforcement learning, that could be used to plug and play object-oriented software objects within a software application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%