2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cluster randomized trial of community mobilization to reduce methamphetamine use and HIV risk among youth in Thailand: Design, implementation and results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cluster randomized trial study was conducted in Thailand and found that youths who were not fully attending school were at risk of initiation of methamphetamine use [25]. A study in the United States also reported that children who were school dropouts were more likely to initiate amphetamine use than those who were in school [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cluster randomized trial study was conducted in Thailand and found that youths who were not fully attending school were at risk of initiation of methamphetamine use [25]. A study in the United States also reported that children who were school dropouts were more likely to initiate amphetamine use than those who were in school [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High retention rates were achieved by two studies, reported as 98% [ 52 ] and 96% [ 49 ], reducing the selection bias in the analysis. Moderate retention rates were achieved at 79% [ 48 ] and 68% was reported by two studies [ 50 , 51 ].The Thai-based community cluster RCT study used a second random sample for the follow-up survey from the intervention and control communities, and therefore retention rates were not applicable [ 53 ]. Loss to follow-up was not appropriate to examine for the qualitative studies [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with less than a 100% consent rate have the potential for selection bias of participants. The studies’ response rates, defined as eligible participants consented to participate, were 85% [ 48 ], 64% [ 49 ], 47% [ 50 ], 35% [ 51 ], and 24% [ 52 ]. The response rates were not provided by three studies reducing ability to assess selection bias [ 53 , 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There seems to be a growing number of efforts to implement community-based SUD services in LMICs that are responsive to context-specific needs, possibilities, and barriers [ 35 , 49 51 ]. Although this topic has not has not yet been systematically investigated, previous individual studies from LMICs have demonstrated that various resource, sociocultural and/or political factors may influence the development, implementation and/or outcomes of community-based SUD interventions [ 35 , 49 , 50 , 52 ]. Therefore, an initial attempt to systematically identify and describe the relevant contextual factors that may affect community-based SUD interventions in LMICs seems warranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%