2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cluster validity index for fuzzy clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…6, bottom insets) and with the Hellinger distance metrics (F (5,218) ϭ 44.1, p Ͻ 0.005 and F (5,218) ϭ 48.6, p Ͻ 0.001 for RKL and Hellinger metrics, respectively). However, in one dimension, the cluster validity index (Zhang et al, 2008) did not produce a clear determination for the number of clusters (Fig. 7A).…”
Section: Dimensionality Reductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6, bottom insets) and with the Hellinger distance metrics (F (5,218) ϭ 44.1, p Ͻ 0.005 and F (5,218) ϭ 48.6, p Ͻ 0.001 for RKL and Hellinger metrics, respectively). However, in one dimension, the cluster validity index (Zhang et al, 2008) did not produce a clear determination for the number of clusters (Fig. 7A).…”
Section: Dimensionality Reductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We used instead a cluster validity index proposed by Zhang et al (2008) (Vw). This validity index uses a ratio between a variation measure in each cluster and a separation measure between the fuzzy clusters, and it is reported to have very good performance (Zhang et al, 2008). For the parametric data, we used the fuzzy hyper volume (FHV) and partition density (PD) indices of Gath and Geva (1989), as well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature offers a wide range of evaluation methods for both inter-segmenter comparisons (Borsotti et al 1998;Chabrier et al 2004;Sahoo et al 1988;Weszka & Rosenfeld 1978;Zhang et al 2008a) and cluster quality evaluation (Halkidi et al 2001;Rezaee et al 1998;Zhang et al 2008b). We focused on and adapted here a cluster validity function to be minimized, first proposed by Xie & Beni (1991) (with the parameter m = 2) and generalized by Pal & Bezdek (1995) …”
Section: The Assess Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of this algorithm is to achieve the goal of data classification through the membership degree of each sample data belonging to a class. The good clustering result has two characteristics: one is to achieve maximum compactness within cluster; the other is to achieve maximum separation between clusters [3]. However, fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithm, which is very sensitive to the noise points and the initial center points, is unable to find the global optimum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%