A clustering-based approach to quantifying socio-demographic impacts on urban mobility patterns

Abstract

This paper uses a generalizable clustering approach to investigate the effects of socio-demographic features on aggregate urban mobility patterns, including activity distribution and travel modal split. We use K-means via principal component analysis to identify eight representative traveler clusters from the 2017 U.S. National Household Travel Survey. Based on the cluster centroids and the cluster percentages within a neighborhood, we can estimate a Temporal Mobility Choice Matrix ( TM) that describes the neighborhood-level aggregate mobility choice pattern. The estimation accuracy is assessed in a case study in LA City. It is found that the neighborhood-level temporal mobility patterns are well-replicated, with an average R2 of 65.47%, 53.15%, and 72.04% among all analyzed neighborhoods in the city. However, we find a moderate to low accuracy in estimating the spatial differences in the mobility patterns across neighborhoods. This could be because factors other than socio-demographics, such as physical and built environment factors like terrain, street quality, or amenity densities, are contributing to the spatial differences but have not been considered in this study. Overall, we show that socio-demographic features alone can approximate the average temporal mobility choice patterns of a given population. Our method and result can serve as the baseline and benchmark for future mobility studies that take the socio-demographics of the traveler population into consideration in modeling.

Assessing impacts of the built environment on mobility: A joint choice model of travel mode and duration

“…These are clusters representing distinct travel patterns of individuals across the US. The derivation and the validation of these traveler clusters have been extensively discussed in a previous paper (Yang et al, 2023).…”

Thematic Review on Women’s Perception of Safety While Walking in Public Space: The STEP UP Project

“…As highlighted by Golan et al [14], Andersotter Fabre et al [16], and Sethi and Velez-Duque [30], women experience the city differently than men due to factors such as concern with security issues related to aggression and harassment. This leads to a major inhibition of mobility for women in public spaces, especially at night time [31]. Although there are several factors that distinguish women's walkability from that of men, the safety factor is the one that proves to be the most relevant [14].…”